Detention of suspects 

Scales of justice
Criminal procedure
Investigating and
charging crimes
Criminal investigation
Arrest warrant
Search warrant
Probable cause
Knock-and-announce
Exigent circumstance
Reasonable suspicion
Search and seizure
Search of persons
Arrest · Detention
Right to silence
Miranda warning
Grand jury
Criminal prosecution
Statute of limitations
Nolle prosequi
Bill of attainder
Ex post facto law
Criminal jurisdiction
Extradition
Habeas corpus · Bail
Inquisitorial system
Adversarial system
Charges and pleas
Arraignment · Information
Indictment
Plea · Peremptory plea
Nolo contendere
Plea bargain
Presentence Investigation
Related areas
Criminal defenses
Criminal law · Evidence
Civil procedure
Portals
Law · Criminal justice
v  d  e

Detention of suspects is the process of keeping a person who has been arrested in a police-cell, prison or other detention centre before trial or sentencing.

Contents

Detention before charge

Jurisdiction Maximum period a person may be detained without charge1
Australia 12 days
Canada 1 day
Denmark 3 days
France 6 days
Germany 2 days
Italy 4 days
New Zealand 2 days
Norway 3 days
Ireland 7 days
Russia 5 days
South Africa 2 days
Spain 5 days
Turkey 7.5 days
United Kingdom 28 days, see below
USA 2 days

Pre-charge detention refers to the period of time that an individual can be held and questioned by police, prior to being charged with an offence.2 Not all countries have such a concept, and in those that do, the period for which a person may be detained without trial varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.3


England and Wales

Where a person is arrested for an offence, they will be taken to a police station. The Custody Officer at that police station must determine whether he has sufficient evidence to charge the detainee for the offence and may keep the detainee in custody until he can make this decision.4 The Custody Officer has sufficient evidence if he has sufficient evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction.5 If the Custody Officer determines that he does have sufficient evidence, he must charge the person or release him.6 If he determines he does not have enough evidence to charge him he must release him unless he has reasonable grounds for believing that his detention without being charged is necessary to secure or preserve evidence relating to an offence for which he is under arrest or to obtain such evidence by questioning him.7

Time limits

In terrorism cases, a person may be detained for up to a maximum of 28 days.8 The United Kingdom's Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith has proposed that the period of for which detention without charge is lawful should be extended from 28 to 42 days.9 The initial passing of this legislation on 11 June 2008 in the House of Commons prompted the then Shadow Home Secretary, David Davis, to resign as an MP and conduct a by-election campaign on the issue. The legislation now passes to the House of Lords for a final vote on whether it will become law. If it passes this stage, then it will be given to the Queen (Elizabeth II) for Royal Assent.

Otherwise (and subject to exceptions), a person may be detained for a maximum of 96 hours from the relevant time (normally the time an arrested person arrives at the first police station that he is taken to)10, in line with the following restrictions:

Authorising person Test to be applied Requirement for review Maximum limit
Custody Officer
  • insufficient evidence to charge the arrested person and
  • reasonable grounds for believing that his detention without being charged is necessary to secure or preserve evidence relating to an offence for which he is under arrest or to obtain such evidence by questioning him11
Review Officer12
  • insufficient evidence to charge the arrested person and
  • reasonable grounds for believing that his detention without being charged is necessary to secure or preserve evidence relating to an offence for which he is under arrest or to obtain such evidence by questioning him12
6 hours after the decision to detain or 9 hours after the last review 24 hours from the relevant time13
Superintendent or above
  • the Review Officer has made two reviews
  • reasonable grounds for believing that
    • his detention without being charged is necessary to secure or preserve evidence relating to an offence for which he is under arrest or to obtain such evidence by questioning him
    • offence for which he is under arrest is an indictable offence
    • investigation is being conducted diligently and expeditiously14
36 hours from the relevant time14
Magistrates' Court
  • application made on oath by a constable
  • satisfied that there are reasonable grounds for believing that
    • his detention without charge is necessary to secure or preserve evidence relating to an offence for which he is under arrest or to obtain such evidence by questioning him;
    • an offence for which he is under arrest is an indictable offence; and
    • the investigation is being conducted diligently and expeditiously.15
The Magistrates' Court can only grant or extend a warrant for up to 36 hours. 96 hours from the relevant time15

On expiry of the time limit, the arrested person must be released, either on or without police bail13 and may not be rearrested without warrant for the same offence unless new evidence has come to light since the original arrest.131415

Detention after charge

England and Wales

Time limits

Following charge, a person may be detained in custody pending their trial or during their trial before sentencing.

Immediately after charge, if the detainee is not released (either on police bail or without bail), he must be brought before a Magistrates' Court as soon as is practicable (first appearance).16. From this point, the following time limits apply17, unless extended by the court18:

Offence type Mode of trial Limit in Magistrates' Court Limit in Crown Court
Summary only Summary trial First appearance to trial: 56 days
Either way Summary trial First appearance to trial: 56 days
Either way Trial on indictment First appearance to committal: 70 days Committal to trial: 112 days
Indictable only Trial on indictment Sent to Crown Court forthwith19 Sent from Magistrates' Court to trial: 182 days

Treatment in detention

England and Wales

The treatment of suspects held in detention is governed by Code H to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 in the case of suspects related to terrorism and by Code C in other cases. It is generally the responsibility of a designated Custody Officer to ensure that the provisions of the relevant Code and of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 are not breached.20

In particular, a person detained has the following rights; and must be informed of these rights at the earliest opportunity:

Searches in detention

England and Wales

Non-intimate searches

The Custody Officer must record everything which an arrested person has with him at the police station and may search a person to the extent that he considers it necessary to do so. The Custody Officer may seize anything, but may only seize clothes or personal effects if the Custody Officer:

An Inspector also has a limited power to order a search of an arrested person in order to facilitate establishing the identity of a person, particularly by discovering tattoos or other marks.24

Where such a search requires more than the removal of the arrested person's outer clothing, the provisions of Code C to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 relating to strip searches apply.

Intimate searches

An intimate search is a search of the bodily orifices (other than the mouth). It should be conducted by a suitably qualified person unless this is impracticable and done in the presence of two other people. An intimate search requires the authorisation of an inspector and may only be made in one of the following circumstances:25

Condition Consent Place
The inspector reasonably believes
  • that the detainee has concealed on him anything he could use and might use in police detention or custody of the court to cause physical injury to himself or others; and
  • that the article in question cannot be found unless the detainee is intimately searched.
Consent is not necessary for the search to take place and reasonable force may be used to conduct the search. Police station, hospital, surgery or other medical premises.
The inspector reasonably believes
  • that the detainee may have a Class A drug concealed on him;
  • that the detainee was in possession of the drug before his arrest with intention to illegally supply or export it; and
  • that it cannot be found unless the detainee is intimately searched.
Consent for the search is necessary. If the detainee refuses to give consent, proper inferences may be drawn but force may not be used. Hospital, surgery or other medical premises.

Bail

Main article: bail

The term remand may be used to describe the process of keeping a person in detention rather than granting bail. A prisoner who is denied, refused or unable to meet the conditions of bail, or who is unable to post bail, may be held in a prison on remand. Reasons for being held in custody on remand vary depending on the local legal system, but may include:

In most countries, remand prisoners are considered innocent until proven guilty by a court and may be granted greater privileges than sentenced prisoners, such as:

Although remanded prisoners are usually detained separately from sentenced prisoners, due to prison overcrowding they are sometimes held in a shared accommodation with sentenced prisoners.

See also

References

  1. ^ Liberty Human Rights, Pre-charge Detention Comparative Law Study, http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/pdfs/pre-charge-detention-comparative-law-study.pdf, retrieved on 22 July 2008 
  2. ^ Liberty Human Rights, Extension of Pre-Trial Detention, http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/2-terrorism/extension-of-pre-charge-detention/index.shtml, retrieved on 9 December 2007 
  3. ^ Liberty Human Rights, Terrorism Pre-Trial Detention: Comparative Law Study Executive Summary, http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/pdfs/comparative-law-exec-summary.pdf, retrieved on 9 December 2007 
  4. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 39 (1).
  5. ^ Code C to the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, para 11.5.
  6. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 39 (7).
  7. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 39 (2).
  8. ^ Terrorism Act 2000, Schedule 8
  9. ^ BBC, Smith plays the numbers game, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7132527.stm, retrieved on 9 December 2007 
  10. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 41
  11. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 37
  12. ^ a b Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 40
  13. ^ a b c Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 41
  14. ^ a b c Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 42
  15. ^ a b c Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, sections 43 and 44
  16. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 46
  17. ^ SI 1987 No. 299. Prosecution of Offences (Custody Time-limits) Regulations 1987
  18. ^ On the basis that the prosecution has acted with all due diligence and expedition and there is good and sufficient cause for doing so: Prosecution of Offences Act 1985, section 22 (3).
  19. ^ Crime and Disorder Act 1998, section 51
  20. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 39.
  21. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 56.
  22. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 58.
  23. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 54.
  24. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 54A.
  25. ^ Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, section 55.