![]() |
|||||||||||||
|
Hydraulic analogy |
The electronic–hydraulic analogy (derisively referred to as the drain-pipe theory by Oliver Heaviside) is the most widely used analogy for "electron fluid" in a metal conductor. Since electric current is invisible and the processes at play in electronics are often difficult to demonstrate, the various electronic components are represented by hydraulic equivalents. Electricity (as well as heat) was originally understood to be a kind of fluid, and the names of certain electric quantities (such as current) are derived from hydraulic equivalents. The water analogy is still of some use in teaching and in describing basic aspects of electric current. Like all analogies, it demands an intuitive and competent understanding of the baseline paradigm (in this case, hydraulics).
Contents |
There are two basic paradigms:
Applications: Flow and pressure variables can be calculated in fluid flow network with the use of the hydraulic ohm analogy.12 The method can be applied to both steady and transient flow situations.
See also Bond graph.
Some examples of equivalent electrical and hydraulic equations:
| type | hydraulic | electric | thermal |
|---|---|---|---|
| quantity | volume V [m3 | charge q [C] | heat Q [J] |
| potential | pressure p [Pa=J/m3 | potential φ [V=J/C] | temperature T [K=J/kB |
| flux | current ΦV [m3/s] | current I [A=C/s] | heat transfer rate [J/s] |
| flux density | velocity v [m/s] | current density j [C/(m2·s) = A/m²] | heat flux [W/m2 |
| linear model | Poiseuille's law ![]() |
Ohm's law ![]() |
Fourier's law ![]() |
If taken too far, the water analogy can create misconceptions. For it to be useful, we must remain aware of the regions where electricity and water behave very differently.