Personal union 

A personal union is the combination by which two or more different states are governed by the same monarch, while their boundaries, their laws and their interests remain distinct.1 It is not to be confused with a federation, which internationally is considered as a single state. Nor is it to be confused with dynastic union, where the union can be under a dynasty.

Personal unions can arise for very different reasons, ranging from near coincidence (a princess who is already married to a king becomes queen regnant, and their child inherits the crown of both countries) to virtual annexation (where a personal union sometimes was seen as a means of preventing uprisings). They can also be codified (i.e. the constitutions of the states clearly express that they shall share the same person as head of state) or non-codified, in which case they can easily be broken (e.g. by different succession rules).

Because presidents of republics are ordinarily chosen from within the citizens of the state in question, personal unions are almost entirely a phenomenon of monarchies, and sometimes the term dual monarchy is used to signify a personal union between two monarchies.citation needed

Personal union was also a bureaucratic device used in Nazi Germany to combine high level state positions with equivalent positions in the National Socialist Party.2

There is a somewhat grey area between personal unions and federations, and the first has regularly grown into the second.

The following is provides some detail of personal unions through history. There are no longer any personal unions in today's world.3

Contents

Andorra

Aragon, Crown of

On 1162 Alfonso II of Aragon was the first person to bear the titles of King of Aragon and Count of Barcelona, ruling what was called later Crown of Aragon.

Bohemia

Brandenburg

Commonwealth realms

The conception of a personal union was suggested to keep the Irish Free State as a Commonwealth Realm.4

The phrase personal union appears in some discussion about the early Commonwealth of Nations 5, though its application to Commonwealth was refuted by others.6

Congo Free State

Croatia

Denmark

England

Finland

France

Note: The point at issue in the War of the Spanish Succession was the fear that the succession to the Spanish throne dictated by Spanish law, which would devolve on Louis, le Grand dauphin — already heir to the throne of France — would create a personal union that would upset the European balance of power (France had the most powerful military in Europe at the time, and Spain the largest empire).

Great Britain

Hanover

Holy Roman Empire

Hungary

Iceland

Ireland

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Navarre

The Netherlands

Norway

Poland

Poland-Lithuania

Portugal

Romania

Saxe-Weimar and Saxe-Eisenach

The duchies of Saxe-Weimar and Saxe-Eisenach were in personal union from 1741, when the ruling house of Saxe-Eisenach died out, until 1809, when they were merged into the single duchy of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach.

Schleswig and Holstein

Duchies with peculiar rules for succession.

Scotland

Spain

Sweden

Main article: Unions of Sweden

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland

References

  1. ^ Lalor, ed. Various authors. See Contents. Cyclopaedia of Political Science. New York: Maynard, Merrill, and Co., ed. John Joseph Lalor, 1899. [Online] available from http://www.econlib.org/LIBRARY/YPDBooks/Lalor/llCy821.html; accessed 21 June 2008
  2. ^ Steinweis, A.E. (1996). Art, Ideology, and Economics in Nazi Germany. UNC Press, 60. 
  3. ^ Oppenheim, Lassa; Roxbrough, Ronald (2005). International Law: A Treatise (in English). The Lawbook Exchange. ISBN 1584776099, 9781584776093. Retrieved on 2008-10-05. "At present there is no Personal Union in existence" 
  4. ^ Mansergh, Nicholas (1934). The Irish Free State - Its Government and Politics. Read Books, 263. 
  5. ^ F. R. Scott (January 1944). "The End of Dominion Status". The American Journal of International Law 38 (1): 34–49. doi:10.2307/2192530, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9300%28194401%2938%3A1%3C34%3ATEODS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B. "The common kinship within the British group today establishes a form of personal union". 
  6. ^ P. E. Corbett (1940). "The Status of the British Commonwealth in International Law". The University of Toronto Law Journal 3 (2): 348–359. doi:10.2307/824318, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0042-0220%281940%293%3A2%3C348%3ATSOTBC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J. 

See also