|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wikipedia:Deletion today |
| Deletion discussions |
|---|
| Deletion policy |
This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.
| Centralized discussion |
 |
| Discussions |
|---|
| Archive |
Site does not appear to pass WP:WEB. Article is written entirely from the primary source. Few wiki links (tagged since last year). Pcap ping 10:02, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
A youth player who hasn't played an official match for Ajax and afaict hasn't played an official match for Odense either. Aecis·(away) talk 09:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
This is an obscure implementation detail of UseModWiki. The article tries to dress it up as some general mechanism, but that's clearly not the case. While the contents is probably verifiable by checking the source of UseModWiki, I don't think it passes WP:N. Pcap ping 09:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Procedural nom, contested merge to List of NCIS characters with an incorrect claim that the merge was not discussed. Article was tagged {{mergeto|List of NCIS characters}} for over 1 month. Per WP:FICT, "individual character articles ... should only be created when the alternatives are not feasible".
Despite being a major character in a notable series, notability is not inherited by the characters. This article does not establish real world notability of the character independent of its series. No reliable third party sources and just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research.
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Todd and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Shepard for precedent. McWomble (talk) 09:25, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Procedural nom, contested merge to List of NCIS characters with an incorrect claim that the merge was not discussed. Article was tagged {{mergeto|List of NCIS characters}} for over 1 month. Per WP:FICT, "individual character articles ... should only be created when the alternatives are not feasible".
Despite being a major character in a notable series, notability is not inherited by the characters. This article does not establish real world notability of the character independent of its series. No reliable third party sources and just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research.
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Todd and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Shepard for precedent. McWomble (talk) 09:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Procedural nom, contested merge to List of NCIS characters with an incorrect claim that the merge was not discussed. Article was tagged {{mergeto|List of NCIS characters}} for over 1 month. Per WP:FICT, "individual character articles ... should only be created when the alternatives are not feasible".
Despite being a major character in a notable series, notability is not inherited by the characters. This article does not establish real world notability of the character independent of its series. No reliable third party sources and just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research.
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Todd and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Shepard for precedent. McWomble (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
The article claims to be a "List of terrorist incidents in Israel". It is in fact a direct copy of the only source cited, a list which appears without references on a blog[1]. There are no inline references for any of the hundreds of incidents listed, and no reliable way of verifying them.
A large proportion of the incidents listed did not actually take place in Israel, but in the 1967-occupied territories.
Although the article starts "All of the below terrorist attacks are against innocent civilians", a large proportion of the victims are actually members of the armed forces.
Much of what is verifiable in the list is already included in one of the several other similar articles; anything missing could easily be added to one of them. RolandR (talk) 09:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Procedural nom, contested merge to List of NCIS characters with an incorrect claim that the merge was not discussed. Article was tagged {{mergeto|List of NCIS characters}} for over 1 month. Per WP:FICT, "individual character articles ... should only be created when the alternatives are not feasible".
Despite being a major character in a notable series, notability is not inherited by the characters. This article does not establish real world notability of the character independent of its series. No reliable third party sources and just made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research.
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Todd and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jenny Shepard for precedent.
McWomble (talk) 09:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Article created by subject, no evidence of notability, appears to be vanity article Thedarxide (talk) 09:11, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Article is BLP describing relatively unknown person, lacks obvious claims to notability, and provides no reliable sources for the claims it does make. Article includes numerous links to subject's website, otherwise is exclusively original research. Earlier this month I looked for appropriate citations and came up empty. Prod rejected by article creator, asked creator to provide sources, but none have been forthcoming. Recommend delete on grounds of lack of notability and verifiability. --Ten Thousand Bullets (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Previously nominated for deletion. This unsourced article is incapable of improvement. The interesting expression is but an unauthoritative definition of the commonly used Cantonese expression to describe flight of street vendors from police. Its use is exclusively in Cantonese and is virtually unknown in the English language, unlike Gweilo. GSearch results in recursive references to WP mirrors and other blogs, none of which are acceptable references. Ohconfucius (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
This article appears to be a hoax, or wishful thinking. There is no such announcement by Valve. The product does not exist and Valve would have only just started it if it is being produced now, meaning that any information on this product would be pure speculation. Richard Cavell (talk) 08:44, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Non-notable commercial software, unreferenced, no assertion of notability, written like an advertisement. Original article was started by a user now banned indefinitely for sockpuppeting. GreyCat (talk) 08:16, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Contested prod. Completely non-notable organization, all references are in passing, plagued with original research issues, lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 07:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:N. No sources at all. Nothing notable about this work. Delete Undead Warrior (talk) 07:36, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
fails WP:ORG. almost no third party coverage Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 06:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
The article's opening sentence puts it well: "There is no Prime Minister of the United States." The article is a collection of witticisms which use the expression, not a discussion of the (non-existent) topic. Steve Dufour (talk) 06:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
I believe that this article is about an Internet radio station. It may not be notable enough for inclusion. It is probably also self-promotion (consider the username of the original author). The article contains a stream of consciousness that is difficult for me to place in context. Richard Cavell (talk) 06:53, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
The article, orphaned since September 2006, fails to indicate the notability and importance of this trust fund set up in 1893. Ohconfucius (talk) 06:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
this is a rather insignificant policy, among thousands issued by the government. No third party sources to attest to its notability. Ohconfucius (talk) 06:38, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
This article describes a future product that is not yet complete. It is unclear whether the product is a computer game, a demo, or a social networking utility. It is unclear whether it will be commercial or free. The product does not appear to have acquired notability. Richard Cavell (talk) 06:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Repeat of page Ganesha replete with WP:MOS problems (page creator SIGNED article) and no sources. ←Spidern→ 05:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject Jay32183 (talk) 05:58, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
fails WP:CREATIVE. simply being a radio presenter is not necessarily notable. Very limited third party coverage in Google news search. Michellecrisp (talk) 05:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)